Skip to main content
NeuroWiki
Antiplatelets

PICSS: Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study: Low-Intensity Warfarin vs Aspirin in the WARSS TEE Substudy (Homma et al., 2002)

In patients with cryptogenic stroke and a patent foramen ovale, does low-intensity warfarin reduce recurrent stroke or death compared with aspirin? Read this as a subgroup of a substudy, not as a trial result.

Homma S et al. (Circulation 2002;105(22):2625-2631) · doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000017498.88393.44 · 98 patients

Population

Included

  • Enrolled in WARSS: non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, excluding atrial fibrillation and extracranial carotid stenosis
  • Underwent transesophageal echocardiography (referral was clinician-driven, not protocolised)
  • For the published subgroup: cryptogenic stroke subtype AND a patent foramen ovale on TEE

Excluded

  • Atrial fibrillation (excluded by the parent trial)
  • Extracranial carotid stenosis (excluded by the parent trial)
  • Cardioembolic stroke mechanism

Result in the PFO group

SUBGROUP, NOT A PRIMARY

NOT A TRIAL RESULT. This is a non-prespecified subgroup of the PICSS transesophageal-echo substudy of WARSS: 98 patients and 14 events in total. The anticoagulant was LOW-INTENSITY warfarin, INR 1.4 to 2.8, so nothing here transfers to modern anticoagulation or to any direct oral anticoagulant.

Low-intensity warfarin

4 of 42

9.5% recurrent stroke or death at 2 years

Aspirin 325 mg

10 of 56

17.9% recurrent stroke or death at 2 years

Hazard ratio

0.52

95% CI 0.16 to 1.67 · p = 0.28

The interval includes 1, so no difference was demonstrated.

Per-arm counts are shown rather than a 100-dot grid because one patient is 2.4 percentage points in the warfarin arm: a dot grid would imply a precision these 98 patients cannot support. Two published extractions of this subgroup disagree on the numerators while carrying the same hazard ratio and interval, which cannot both be right; the composite figures shown here match the endpoint the parent trial actually set. No NNT is computed.

Study Arms

Agent
Warfarin
Dose
Titrated to a target INR of 1.4 to 2.8
Route
Oral
Frequency
Daily, dose-adjusted
Duration
2 years

THE governing caveat on this trial. This is LOW-INTENSITY anticoagulation. It is not the INR 2 to 3 used in CLOSE and it is not a direct oral anticoagulant, so PICSS supports no inference about standard-intensity vitamin K antagonism or about any DOAC.

Trial Design

Type

  • Transesophageal-echocardiography SUBSTUDY of the WARSS randomized trial, not a standalone trial
  • Parent design: double-blind randomized comparison of low-intensity warfarin (INR 1.4 to 2.8) against aspirin 325 mg daily
  • Parent population: non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, excluding atrial fibrillation and extracranial carotid stenosis
  • TEE referral was clinician-driven rather than protocolised, so PICSS is a SELECTED subset of WARSS
  • The cryptogenic-stroke-with-PFO comparison is a NON-PRESPECIFIED SUBGROUP of that substudy
  • Parent primary endpoint: recurrent ischemic stroke or death from any cause within two years

Timeline

42 US centres, enrolled 1993 to 2000; 2-year follow-up. Published Circulation 2002;105(22):2625-2631

N

98

Enrollment

630 WARSS patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography and a PFO was found in 203 (33.8%). The cell displayed here is the 98 patients who had both cryptogenic stroke and a PFO. WARSS randomized warfarin titrated to INR 1.4 to 2.8 against aspirin 325 mg daily, double-blind. Published Circulation 2002; parent trial NEJM 2001.

Bedside Pearl

PICSS (Circulation 2002) cannot answer whether anticoagulation beats aspirin in PFO-associated cryptogenic stroke. The quoted comparison, 4 of 42 (9.5%) vs 10 of 56 (17.9%) for recurrent ischemic stroke or death at 2 years, HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.16 to 1.67), P=0.28, is a NON-PRESPECIFIED SUBGROUP OF A SUBSTUDY resting on 14 events, and the anticoagulant was LOW-INTENSITY warfarin at INR 1.4 to 2.8, not modern anticoagulation. Hypothesis-generating only. The AAN 2020 advisory (Statement 3a, Level C) treats the two agents as equally acceptable. No NNT.

NeuroWiki is a clinical reference. It does not substitute for your clinical judgment, current guidelines, or your institution's protocol. Verify before acting. Do not enter patient names, MRNs, or dates of birth. Privacy Policy