Skip to main content
NeuroWiki

Clinical Question

PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke?

Synthesises 3 trialsthree NEJM 2017 trials resolved a decade of ambiguity; AF excess is the trade-off

Clinical Synthesis

For selected patients <60 with cryptogenic ischemic stroke and a PFO carrying high-risk morphology, transcatheter closure plus antiplatelet therapy reduces recurrent stroke compared with antiplatelet alone; atrial fibrillation excess is the central trade-off.

Bottom line

In selected non-lacunar cryptogenic-stroke patients <60 with PFO carrying high-risk morphology and no other apparent etiology, percutaneous PFO closure plus long-term antiplatelet is reasonable (Class IIa, Level B-R). Confirm cryptogenic status with vessel imaging + prolonged cardiac monitoring + echocardiography with bubble study before applying.

NeuroWiki is a clinical reference. It does not substitute for your clinical judgment, current guidelines, or your institution's protocol. Verify before acting. Do not enter patient names, MRNs, or dates of birth. Privacy Policy