Skip to main content
NeuroWiki
Trial

TIMELESS Trial: Tenecteplase 4.5-24 Hours with Perfusion-Imaging Selection

In patients with LVO and perfusion-imaging evidence of salvageable tissue presenting 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke onset, does tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg improve 90-day functional outcome compared with placebo?

Albers GW, et al. (NEJM 2024) · doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2310392 · 458 patients

Population

Included

  • ICA or MCA (M1 or proximal M2) occlusion on CTA
  • Perfusion imaging mismatch confirming salvageable tissue
  • 4.5 to 24 hours from stroke onset
  • Age 18 or older

Excluded

  • ASPECTS below 6 on CT or DWI-ASPECTS below 6 on MRI
  • Contraindication to thrombolysis
  • No large vessel occlusion on imaging

Primary Outcome — mRS Distribution at 90 Days

All randomized patients (458 patients, 77% underwent EVT)

Tenecteplasen=226
15.5%
16.8%
13.7%
15%
12.8%
6.6%
19.5%
Placebon=229
13.5%
13.1%
15.7%
14.8%
17.9%
5.7%
19.2%
Shift in distributioncOR 1.13(95% CI 0.82–1.57)p=0.450
Not significant

Study Arms

Agent
Tenecteplase
Dose
0.25 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg)
Route
IV
Frequency
Single bolus over a period of 5 seconds
Duration
One-time, given 4.5 to 24 hours after last known well
Co-interventions
Tenecteplase was given as soon as possible, ideally before the arterial puncture for a planned endovascular thrombectomy. 77.3% of enrolled patients subsequently underwent thrombectomy. All patients received medical care per institutional protocols and AHA-ASA guidelines.

Late-window thrombolysis selected by CT or MRI perfusion mismatch (ICA or MCA occlusion with salvageable tissue). The trial was neutral: tenecteplase did not improve the 90-day ordinal mRS distribution (adjusted common OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82-1.57, P=0.45). Because most patients underwent thrombectomy, the result applies to the bridging context, not to thrombolysis alone in the late window.

Trial Design

Type

  • Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
  • ICA/MCA occlusion with salvageable tissue 4.5-24 hours
  • Most patients subsequently underwent EVT

Timeline

NEJM 2024

N

458

Enrollment

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ICA or MCA occlusion with CTP-confirmed salvageable tissue. 4.5-24 hours from onset. Published NEJM 2024. 77% of patients proceeded to EVT.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT03785678

Bedside Pearl

TIMELESS is not evidence against late-window IVT in all settings. It is specifically negative for bridging tenecteplase before thrombectomy in the 4.5-24 hour window (77% of patients underwent EVT). The contrast is TRACE-III: in perfusion-selected LVO patients without EVT access, late-window tenecteplase improved mRS 0-1 from 24.2% to 33.0% (NNT 11). The rule is: late-window IVT may help when EVT is unavailable; it adds nothing as a bridge when EVT is being performed.

See also

NeuroWiki is a clinical reference. It does not substitute for your clinical judgment, current guidelines, or your institution's protocol. Verify before acting. Do not enter patient names, MRNs, or dates of birth. Privacy Policy