Skip to main content
NeuroWiki
Thrombectomy

COMPASS Trial: Aspiration First Pass vs Stent Retriever First Line

In patients with anterior circulation LVO treated within 6 hours, is aspiration first-pass technique non-inferior to stent-retriever first-line for 90-day functional outcome (mRS 0-2)?

Turk et al. (Lancet 2019) · doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1 · 270 patients

Population

Included

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ICA terminus, M1, or M2)
  • Groin puncture initiable within 6 hours of last known well
  • NIHSS 6 or greater
  • Pre-stroke mRS 0 or 1
  • ASPECTS 6 or greater

Excluded

  • Posterior circulation occlusion
  • Pre-existing functional disability (mRS 2 or greater)
  • Tandem cervical occlusion requiring stenting
  • Contraindication to contrast or anesthesia
  • Life expectancy under 6 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02466893· Retrieved 2026-06-08

Primary Outcome — mRS 0-2 at 90 Days (Non-inferiority)

All randomized patients (anterior circulation LVO, within 6 hours)

Non-inferiority design: technique equivalence

This trial shows aspiration-first is no worse than stent-retriever-first for functional outcome, not that either technique is superior. Aspiration achieved lower first-pass reperfusion (68.9% vs 76.3%) but equivalent clinical outcomes.

Aspiration First Pass
52 / 100
Stent Retriever First Line
50 / 100

Small absolute difference — interpret with caution

mRS 0-2 at 90 Days

Risk ratio RD +2 pp95% CI -8 pp–11 ppp = 0.0014 (NI)

Study Arms

Agent
Direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) with large-bore aspiration catheter
Route
Endovascular
Frequency
Up to 3 first-line passes with assigned approach; rescue therapy thereafter if persistent occlusion
Co-interventions
FDA-cleared aspiration catheter (Penumbra System) first line; if aspiration failed after up to 3 passes, operators could switch to stent retriever or any therapy per physician preference; adjunctive balloon-guide / concurrent distal aspiration permitted.

Penumbra aspiration first line; ≥3 passes then crossover; success = TICI 2b/2c/3 (Turk Lancet 2019 Procedures p.999-1000).

Trial Design

Type

  • Multicenter randomized open-label noninferiority trial
  • Aspiration first pass vs stent retriever first line
  • Anterior circulation LVO within 6 hours
  • Blinded outcome assessment with core-lab adjudication

Timeline

Conducted at 15 North American sites

N

270

Enrollment

Multicenter randomized open-label non-inferiority trial enrolling 270 patients at 15 North American sites (Turk Lancet 2019). Blinded outcome assessment.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT02466893

Bedside Pearl

COMPASS supports operator choice between aspiration-first and stent-retriever-first as initial EVT technique. Lower first-pass reperfusion with aspiration (68.9% vs 76.3%) did not translate to worse 90-day outcomes when rescue devices were available. Choose based on clot characteristics, operator experience, and access anatomy.

NeuroWiki is a clinical reference. It does not substitute for your clinical judgment, current guidelines, or your institution's protocol. Verify before acting. Do not enter patient names, MRNs, or dates of birth. Privacy Policy