Skip to main content
NeuroWiki
Thrombectomy

BAOCHE Trial: Basilar EVT 6-24 Hours

In acute basilar artery occlusion 6–24 hours after last-known-well, does endovascular thrombectomy improve mRS 0–3 at 90 days compared with standard medical care? (Primary outcome was amended mid-trial from mRS 0–4 to mRS 0–3 before unblinding.)

Jovin et al. (NEJM 2022) · doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207576 · 217 patients

Population

Included

  • Age 18–80
  • Acute basilar artery or bilateral intracranial vertebral occlusion
  • 6–24 hours from last-known-well
  • NIHSS ≥6 (post-amendment; initially ≥10)
  • PC-ASPECTS ≥6, Pons-Midbrain Index ≤2, pre-stroke mRS 0–1

Excluded

  • Anterior circulation LVO
  • Pre-stroke mRS ≥2
  • PC-ASPECTS <6 or Pons-Midbrain Index >2
  • Recent ICH or amyloid angiopathy
  • Age >80

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02737189· Retrieved 2026-06-08

Primary Outcome

Protocol amendment: Primary outcome changed from mRS 0–4 to mRS 0–3 mid-trial (before unblinding). The original mRS 0–4 result was NEGATIVE (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95–1.54). Trial stopped early for efficacy at planned interim — effect size may be overestimated.

ThrombectomyBetter outcome
46 / 100
Best Medical Therapy
24 / 100

mRS 0–3 at 90 Days (revised primary)

Risk ratio RR 1.8195% CI 1.26–2.60p = <0.001
NNT~5to achieve mRS 0–3 at 90 days (display with amendment caveat)

Study Arms

Agent
Endovascular thrombectomy with Solitaire stent retriever (Medtronic), added to standard medical care
Route
Endovascular
Frequency
Single index procedure
Duration
6–24 h after symptom onset / last known well
Co-interventions
Standard medical care per current Chinese guidelines; IV thrombolysis if arrived within the 4.5 h window and met safety criteria, used in 14% of thrombectomy-group patients (Jovin NEJM 2022 p.1373,1375)

Solitaire device (retrievable self-expanding stent). Rescue reperfusion with other devices/pharmacologic agents NOT permitted except balloon angioplasty or stenting of the vertebral/basilar artery. Procedural complications 11% (p.1375).

Safety

Symptomatic ICH (SITS-MOST, primary safety)

Thrombectomy

6%

Best Medical Therapy

1%

6/102 EVT vs 1/88 control (RR 5.18, 95% CI 0.64–42.18). Trending higher but not statistically significant.

90-day mortality

Thrombectomy

31%

Best Medical Therapy

42%

34/110 EVT vs 45/107 control (adjusted RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54–1.04). Direction favorable but NOT statistically significant. Do not claim mortality benefit for BAOCHE alone.

Trial Design

Type

  • Multicenter randomized open-label trial
  • Conducted in China
  • Late window (6-24 hours)
  • 1:1 allocation (Thrombectomy vs. Medical)
  • Stopped early at interim for efficacy (Apr 2022) after 212/318 planned patients

Timeline

Enrolled Aug 2016 – Jun 2021 (stopped early Apr 2022 for efficacy)

N

217

Enrollment

217 patients (110 EVT / 107 control, 1:1 ITT) in China. Enrolled Aug 2016 – Jun 2021. Stopped early Apr 2022 at planned interim for efficacy. Published NEJM 2022.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT02737189

Bedside Pearl

For basilar artery occlusion 6–24 hours after last-known-well with NIHSS ≥6, PC-ASPECTS ≥6, and Pons-Midbrain Index ≤2, EVT is reasonable. Note: primary outcome was amended mid-trial (mRS 0–4 → mRS 0–3); the original mRS 0–4 result was NEGATIVE. Trial stopped early, so effect size is likely overestimated.

Trial lineage

Endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion

BEST and BASICS were the first two RCTs in basilar-artery occlusion and both failed their primary frame — driven by substantial crossover in BEST and a control arm in BASICS that frequently received alteplase. ATTENTION and BAOCHE, both in Chinese populations, established benefit in 0-12 h and 6-24 h windows respectively and shifted guideline support toward EVT for basilar LVO.

  1. 2020
    BEST TrialNEUTRAL

    First RCT of EVT for basilar artery occlusion. ITT primary (mRS 0-3 at 90 days): 42% vs 32% (OR 1.74, CI 0.81–3.74, p=0.23). Terminated early for crossover and low enrollment. Preceded ATTENTION (2022).

  2. 2021

    Multinational RCT of EVT for basilar artery occlusion within 6 hours. Primary (mRS 0-3 at 90 days): 44.2% EVT vs 37.7% medical (RR 1.18, CI 0.92–1.50, P=0.19). Statistically negative; CI did not rule out meaningful benefit. Preceded ATTENTION (2022).

  3. 2022

    Basilar artery thrombectomy within 12 hours; China trial.

  4. 2022
    BAOCHE Trial· this pagePOSITIVE

    Basilar EVT 6–24 hours with imaging selection.

NeuroWiki is a clinical reference. It does not substitute for your clinical judgment, current guidelines, or your institution's protocol. Verify before acting. Do not enter patient names, MRNs, or dates of birth. Privacy Policy