Skip to main content
NeuroWiki
Thrombectomy

ANGEL-ASPECT Trial: Large Core Thrombectomy (China)

In Chinese patients with anterior LVO and large ischemic core (ASPECTS 3–5, OR ASPECTS 0–2 with core 70–100 mL), does endovascular thrombectomy improve the mRS distribution at 90 days compared with medical management?

Huo et al. (NEJM 2023;388(14):1272–1283) · doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213379 · 456 patients

Population

Included

  • Anterior LVO
  • Age ≤80; NIHSS 6–30
  • Pre-stroke mRS 0–1
  • ASPECTS 3–5 (no core limit) OR ASPECTS 0–2 with core 70–100 mL OR ASPECTS >5 with core 70–100 mL (6–24h)

Excluded

  • ASPECTS ≥6 with smaller cores (use small-core evidence)
  • Pre-stroke mRS ≥2
  • Age >80
  • NIHSS <6 or >30
  • Significant mass effect

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04551664· Retrieved 2026-06-08

Primary Outcome — Ordinal mRS Shift

Ordinal-shift design: Primary is generalized OR for ordinal mRS shift (gOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11–1.69, P=0.004). The mRS 0–2 binary (functional independence) shown below is a secondary outcome. Higher any-ICH rate than SELECT2 (49.1% vs 17.3%); careful BP management required.

ThrombectomyBetter outcome
30 / 100
Medical Therapy
11 / 100

mRS 0–2 at 90 Days (secondary)

Risk ratio gOR 1.3795% CI 1.11–1.69p = 0.004

Study Arms

Agent
Endovascular thrombectomy (stent retriever or contact-aspiration first-line; ± balloon angioplasty, stent implantation, or intraarterial thrombolysis as needed)
Route
Endovascular
Frequency
Single procedure
Duration
Within 24 h of stroke onset
Co-interventions
IV thrombolysis when eligible: alteplase 0.9 mg/kg or urokinase 1.0–1.5 million IU (~28% of patients in both groups); medical management per Chinese Stroke Association guidelines

Large-core selection broader than SELECT2: ASPECTS 3–5 (any core), ASPECTS >5 with core 70–100 ml (6–24 h), ASPECTS <3 with core 70–100 ml. ICA-terminal or M1 occlusion. Simple 1:1 randomization (Huo NEJM 2023 p.1274).

Safety

Symptomatic ICH

Thrombectomy

6.1%

Medical Therapy

2.7%

6.1% EVT vs 2.7% medical (P=0.12, NS but trending higher). Higher than SELECT2. Careful BP management warranted.

90-day mortality

Thrombectomy

21.7%

Medical Therapy

20%

21.7% vs 20.0% (NS). No mortality penalty despite higher ICH rates.

Any ICH (radiographic + symptomatic)

Thrombectomy

49.1%

Medical Therapy

17.3%

49.1% EVT vs 17.3% medical (P<0.001). Most are asymptomatic but warrants vigilant monitoring.

Trial Design

Type

  • Multicenter randomized open-label trial
  • Conducted in China
  • Large core selection (ASPECTS 3-5 or Core 70-100ml; also ASPECTS 0–2 with core 70–100mL)
  • 1:1 allocation (Thrombectomy vs. Medical)
  • Stopped early for efficacy (2nd interim)

Timeline

Enrolled 2020-2022

N

456

Enrollment

456 patients in China; age ≤80; NIHSS 6–30. Stopped early at 2nd interim. Published NEJM 2023;388(14):1272–1283.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT04551664

Bedside Pearl

In a broader large-core population (China, includes ASPECTS 0–2 with core 70–100 mL), EVT improves ordinal mRS shift (gOR 1.37, P=0.004). Functional independence 30% vs 11.6% (NNT 5.4 from secondary). Higher ICH rates than SELECT2; BP management is critical.

NeuroWiki is a clinical reference. It does not substitute for your clinical judgment, current guidelines, or your institution's protocol. Verify before acting. Do not enter patient names, MRNs, or dates of birth. Privacy Policy